"Today, words are routinely used as political weapons rather than as good-faith attempts to describe reality. Physical and moral truth can be inconvenient for certain factions trying to shape...
Science cannot and will not flourish in our New Golden Age of Exploration until it gives up methodological or philosophical naturalism.
Whether atheist or Christian, no matter what religion or philosophy, faith is found to be the foundation . . .
Today, most social scientists and scholars of religion see humanity as spiritual by nature, meaning religious. The secularization thesis is dead . . .
So, what does it mean to be spooky, to be a spook, to be surreal, to be unreal, to be not-material? Does such existence exist? Is everything obviously material, or is it unnecessary to even think . . .
Within this Gang of Three, we have a theologian, a philosopher, and a scientist. Each man is quite capable of playing musical chairs within each academic category at some level . . .
But when we look at the complexity of cells in the videos above and consider all of scientific discovery just in the last 100 years, we can easily see why so many scientists today question certain random-chaotic . . .
John Gray’s recent book, Seven Types of Atheism, however, says very clearly: “Not so fast. There are many commonalities between religious persons and atheists . . .
It features three well-established academics who believe Charles Darwin was wrong about natural selection’s ability to create new species . . .
